An article from 2006 in the New Yorker by Richard Preston, entitled Tall for its Age (alas, behind a paywall) chronicles the recent discoveries of the world's tallest trees. These trees, with colorful names like the Stratosphere Giant and Helios, are all Redwoods and about 370 feet tall. The tallest is named Hyperion and is over 379 feet tall, and was only discovered in the last few years.
 
 
Chess players are often rated according to a methodology developed by Arpad Elo, which is implemented by a number of organizations, including FIDE. According to this system, the ratings of the greatest players has increased over time, making this a mesofact. However, there are many who contend that this is simply a symptom of ratings inflation, and is not necessarily due to a true increase in the skill of the players. This is discussed in detail here.
 
 
I have an article in this Sunday's Ideas section of the Boston Globe entitled Hard to find: Why it's increasingly difficult to make discoveries - and other insights from the science of science. It discusses a scientific paper of mine published recently in Scientometrics, which is the journal of the "science of science". The journal article entitled Quantifying the Ease of Scientific Discovery (also freely available on the arXiv), discusses how to think mathematically about how scientific discovery becomes more difficult over time.

Examining three different scientific areas of discovery - the number of mammalian species known, the number of minor planets (asteroids) known, and the number of chemical elements known - I found that their "ease of discovery", as quantified by using size, all have the same mathematical shape. For example, I calculated the average diameter of asteroids discovered each year, and this decreases according to a clear function (for those interested, it's an exponential decay).

Of course, the increased difficulty of discovery within a single discipline should not lead to a state of despondency, where we assume everything than can be discovered already has been. Instead this type of quantitative research can help us to understand the social and technological processes that underlie scientific discovery.

Both the Globe piece and the scientific article were a lot of fun to write, since I got to discuss scientometrics and patterns in science over hundreds of years of discovery. In addition, all the data sources I used are freely available, so you should feel free to play with the data sources.

Here's a figure from the paper, if you're interested (A shows the average size of discovered minor planets, B shows the average size of discovered mammal species, and C shows the average inverse size of discovered chemical elements):
Picture
 
 
Yesterday, June 28, 2010, marks the 12,000th day of the Voyager 2 mission. Since 1977, Voyager 2 (along with its companion Voyager 1) has been exploring the solar system and pushing the envelope of the extent of our exploration of the universe. How far these probes have gone, and how far humanity has ventured away from Earth (albeit indirectly), are intertwined mesofacts. And the current status is that Voyager 2 is 14 billion kilometers from the sun, and Voyager 1 is more than 17 billion kilometers from the sun. Of course, these are both less than two-tenths of a percent of a single light-year, meaning that we have our exploration cut out for us. In addition, the Voyager probes are not actually the farthest probes; Pioneers 10 and 11 hold that distinction. However, they are no longer operational, and so while they continue to move through space, they no longer actively explore.

An interesting side-note: I learned of this milestone courtesy of Voyager 2's Twitter feed, @Voyager2, which was described as follows:

"12,000 days since launch, & still going strong. Thank you, to all who designed me, put me together, talk to me, & keep me going to this day."

I can only imagine that this is a subtle allusion to the ancient Jewish prayer known as the Shehecheyanu, which is traditionally said to celebrate special occasions. It is translated as follows:

"Blessed are You, Lord our God, Ruler of the universe, who has granted us life, sustained us, and enabled us to reach this occasion."

For further reading about the Voyager probes, I recommend checking out Todd Sieling's wonderful paean to the Voyager mission, showing its effect on a single person.
 
 
A few weeks ago, Geoff Nicholson had an essay in the New York Times Book Review entitled The Joy of (Outdated) Facts. Nicholson writes of facts, our obsession with them, and how they change, though there is unfortunately no mention of mesofacts by name. Here is one passage, among many interesting ones:

"Of course, ideas of what’s worth knowing, and even what’s interesting, are constantly changing: The fascination with trigonometrical formulas certainly seems to have receded. But in a world where ever fewer people care about, or even understand the nature of, fiction, where readers and viewers demand facts and reality, outdated books of supposedly impartial information can be a useful reminder of just how slippery facts are — as unreliable as the most unreliable narrator."

The entire article is well worth a read.
 
 
Picture
Since 1947, the fraction of the economy that is responsible for manufacturing has remained relatively constant. Meanwhile, the fraction of the population employed by the manufacturing sector has fallen drastically. (thanks, Michael)
 
 
Wikipedia has an astonishing page entitled List of Statistically Superlative Countries. This page is a veritable treasure trove of mesofacts, from largest spinach producer (China) to most Eurovision wins (Ireland). Read this page often, both for the changing facts and to learn the extent to which countries are the 'best'.
 
 
Both the Aral Sea, bordering Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, and the Dead Sea, bordering Israel and Jordan, are not of constant shape. Their sizes have been shrinking over the past decades. The Soviets diverted water from the Aral Sea for irrigation projects leading to the collapse in size, and the Dead Sea is shrinking due to water from the Jordan River (which feeds into Dead Sea) being diverted.

A NASA website shows the amount the Aral Sea has shrunk since 1960, focusing on the amount it has grown smaller in the past decade.

And here is an animated graphic showing the change in size of the Dead Sea from 1960 to 2007:
Picture
However, there has recently been some talk of connecting the Red Sea to the Dead Sea.

(thanks Pete for bringing this topic to my attention!)
 
 
The World's New Numbers, by Martin Walker, in last year's Wilson Quarterly, discusses an astonishing number of demographic mesofacts. For example:

"The various demographic changes I have described arrived with remarkable speed. At the turn of this century, the conventional wisdom among demographers was that the population of Europe was in precipitous decline, the Islamic world was in the grip of a population explosion, and Africa’s population faced devastation by HIV/AIDS. Only a handful of scholars questioned the idea that the Chinese would outnumber all other groupsfor decades or even centuries to come. In fact, however, the latest UN projections suggest that China’s population, now 1.3 billion, will increase slowly through 2030 but may then be reduced to half that number by the end of the ­century."

The whole article is well worth a read. (thanks to Helen)
 
 
Mesofact is apparently becoming a word, at least according to Fox News, in its list of 25 New Tech Words You Need to Know:

"A mesofact is a fact that is slowly evolving over time. For example, the term "national healthcare" might have one meaning at first, but slowly evolves to become more concrete, as the actual laws emerge. Original use: on Wikipedia, users often add more detail to an entry as the original meaning and facts evolve."

And perhaps the article's highest praise is that I am not mentioned anywhere in the piece and it's just treated as a regular new word, so maybe it's entering our lexicon. It's even in Wordnik, the massive online dictionary created by Erin McKean.

Two weeks ago, Colin McEnroe, asked me on his radio show if I am using copyright or trademark to protect the use of 'mesofact' and I told him I would much rather have it enter our vocabulary. And perhaps it is. But if you're worried about these kinds of words in our lexicon, read Erin McKean's article about this quandary, and why you shouldn't be all that concerned. So please feel free to use mesofact!